Comments on: IDictionary<TKey,TValue>, IXmlSerializable, and lambdas http://www.deploymentzone.com/2008/09/19/idictionarytkeytvalue-ixmlserializable-and-lambdas/ Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:02:19 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: hamsterlegs http://www.deploymentzone.com/2008/09/19/idictionarytkeytvalue-ixmlserializable-and-lambdas/comment-page-1/#comment-22 hamsterlegs Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:08:32 +0000 http://www.deploymentzone.com/2008/09/19/idictionarytkeytvalue-ixmlserializable-and-lambdas/#comment-22 Very good! Very good!

]]> By: Chuck http://www.deploymentzone.com/2008/09/19/idictionarytkeytvalue-ixmlserializable-and-lambdas/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Chuck Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:45:30 +0000 http://www.deploymentzone.com/2008/09/19/idictionarytkeytvalue-ixmlserializable-and-lambdas/#comment-17 Oh yes any code I put up here is always free for the taking. It hadn't even crossed my mind to be honest! I find it highly unlikely that they would get rid of IXmlSerializable. Its possible it could be deprecated but I don't think that'll happen anytime soon. I'm glad you find the code helpful. Hopefully we'll have a built in .NET Fx solution in the future so this isn't necessary. Oh yes any code I put up here is always free for the taking. It hadn’t even crossed my mind to be honest!

I find it highly unlikely that they would get rid of IXmlSerializable. Its possible it could be deprecated but I don’t think that’ll happen anytime soon.

I’m glad you find the code helpful. Hopefully we’ll have a built in .NET Fx solution in the future so this isn’t necessary.

]]> By: Stane http://www.deploymentzone.com/2008/09/19/idictionarytkeytvalue-ixmlserializable-and-lambdas/comment-page-1/#comment-16 Stane Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:38:23 +0000 http://www.deploymentzone.com/2008/09/19/idictionarytkeytvalue-ixmlserializable-and-lambdas/#comment-16 Your serializable IDictionary solution. Hi Chuck, in my search towards an implementable serializable IDictionary I will most probably choose yours. I tried it with my classes and it seems to work. Because the code is quite readable, I think I will be able to change it should it be needed. It seems that the code is free, is this so? I will reference the site I found it in a file header, is this enough? Is it probable, in your opinion, BTW, that MS would change or exclude the IXmlSerializable interface in future versions? I am working on a comprehensive class library, and would hate it if I need to change the basis in a year or so ;-) Otherwise, thanks for your solution Stane Your serializable IDictionary solution.
Hi Chuck, in my search towards an implementable serializable IDictionary I will most probably choose yours. I tried it with my classes and it seems to work. Because the code is quite readable, I think I will be able to change it should it be needed.
It seems that the code is free, is this so? I will reference the site I found it in a file header, is this enough?
Is it probable, in your opinion, BTW, that MS would change or exclude the IXmlSerializable interface in future versions? I am working on a comprehensive class library, and would hate it if I need to change the basis in a year or so ;-)

Otherwise, thanks for your solution
Stane

]]>